I can understand why she could rub someone the wrong way..She crosses the
line..but she has that same fresh quality about her that I remember from a
Tracey Ullman circa '87. That is tough competition...i think it's Tina Fey's
year.


----- Original Message -----
From: Roger Reini
To: totallytraceyullmanclub@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Totally Tracey Ullman Club] Screen actors guild awards


I'd listed the other nominees on my site. No, Sarah Silverman is not
among them. For some reason, she rubs me the wrong way, but maybe I
should give her another chance.

Here are the other nominees for the SAG award: Christina Applegate,
Samantha Who?; America Ferrera, Ugly Betty; Tina Fey, 30 Rock; Mary-
Louise Parker, Weeds. Tough competition!

Roger

On Dec 19, 2008, at 3:59 AM, tugohome wrote:

> Do you have the other nominees? I saw Sarah Silverman's program
> while on vacation in the US and it was incisive and lol hilarious.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Roger Reini
> To: totallytraceyullmanclub@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 3:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [Totally Tracey Ullman Club] Screen actors guild awards
>
> Well, it is a formidable group of competitors. All are worthy of the
> award; of course, we have our favorite :)
>
> On Dec 18, 2008, at 4:23 PM, Laurie La Badie wrote:
>
> > I think everyone in this group would be quite happy.
> > I really hope she wins but Tina Fey worries me.
> >
> > --- On Thu, 12/18/08, Roger Reini <roger@...> wrote:
> >
> > From: Roger Reini <roger@...>
> > Subject: Re: [Totally Tracey Ullman Club] Screen actors guild awards
> > To: totallytraceyullmanclub@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Thursday, December 18, 2008, 11:02 AM
> >
> > A quite sensible choice, we'll all agree. What, you think anyone on
> > this group would disagree?
> >
> > Roger
> >
> > On Dec 18, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Laurie wrote:
> >
> > > Tracey has been nominated for best actress in a comedy series.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]