This group is kind of quiet, and I myself am pretty busy, but think that
how one defines certain terms matters, for example "realistic." I think
that love is the most important thing there is . . . luck or "good", I am
not sure what "good" means, but I believe it is better to do the right
thing as you know it. Would I want a series of bad breaks? Of course
not. But I also have to live with myself.

--- In thewoodyallenadorers@yahoogroups.com, "katelynbogacki"
<katelynbogacki@y...> wrote:
>
> I was fortunate enough to catch a pre-screening of "Match Point" a
> couple of days ago, and I must say that the film blew me away. This is
> a true return to brilliance for Allen, and strikingly poignant movie
> regardless of if you are a fan of the director or not. While I don't
> want to give much away, I must say that the key questions that the film
> raises are those of love vs. lust and, perhaps more importantly, luck
> vs. hard work. While the instability of the relationships in the film
> leaves the former question more up in the air, the latter is perhaps
> more easily debatable in the context of Rys Meyers' character. What do
> you guys think? Is lust or love more realistic? And is it better to be
> lucky or good?
>