Ya I remember the priest saying how it wasn't actually 'The Devil'
the demon just tried to pass itself of as one to confuse people,
quite pathetic really if you think about it, I meant the demon must
have some sort of inferiority comlex or something to want to make
itself seem more important.

--- In theexorcistmemoriespage@yahoogroups.com, HeJoh
<sloo0449@p...> wrote:
> let me explain one thing
> linda blair's character in the movie was never possessed by a/the
devil
> but by a demon
>
>
> Joop :)
>
> http://home.planet.nl/~hejoh/index.html
>
> i am not trying to be difficult, it just comes naturally...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: cyber_abraxas
> To: theexorcistmemoriespage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 8:43 PM
> Subject: [THE EXORCIST memories page] The Exorcist sequels
>
>
> Hey, did you guys see Exorcist II and III if so what did you
think? I
> thought they were quite strange. I can understand the bit where
the
> grown up linda blair's char has to go see doctors cos
understandable
> she would be disturbed after what happened... but the parts with
James
> Earl-Jone's character and a the plague of Locuses. can anyone
explain
> to me how that connected to the first film? cos the devil which
> posessed blair in the first film was an Assyrian demon which
fits in
> with the general judao-christian mythos but then they came in
with
> some confused african/vodoo stuff in Exocist II, whats that
about???
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theexorcistmemoriespage/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> theexorcistmemoriespage-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]