Wow, I guess I'd never seen Kong as such an extention of a male's
desire to "control" a female, but now that you mention it, I can see
a new aspect to the story. But who is truly "in control" -- the one
who appears to be phyiscally dominant (within reason) or the "prized
one" "in the palm of the hand"?

Agent 005




--- In sonsofkong@yahoogroups.com, "Sally" <risk_girl75@...> wrote:
>
> I think (ok I'm guessing) what Sue meant in her question was that
do
> some men think it is cool to be really in physical control of a
woman
> the way that King obviously was in the film, ie, to literally have
a
> woman in the palm of their hand (in the non sexual sense of
course).
> It's a bit of a no no for the modern male to admit that these days
I
> suppose but there are those who might who might think it without
> saying I'll bet.
>
> We all have fantasies and one like that is perfectly
understandable
> and harmless to me.
>
>
>

> >
>