Perhaps one point is being overlooked. I suppose it is
nice that there are all these Laura Bertram lookalikes
running around. But there is only one Laura Bertram
and there is no substitute for the original.

Just putting in my two cents.
--- Ductman <jmiles@...> wrote:
> Careful now, look over there at your calculator,
> it's getting jealous your
> playing with your keyboard and she doesn't like that
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "W Stuart" <billstew@...>
> To: <laurabertramfanatics@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 3:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [LaURa BerTRaM FaNaTiCs] Density of
> Laura Bertram dopplegagners
> in USA
>
>
> > No. Theoretically speaking, if you were to look
> hard enough, one could
> > find some Laura Bertram doppleganger to insemiate
> on a weekly interval.
> >
> > Laura is not my type, but her phenotype is very
> common.
> > I would prefer Angela Devi or other like birds.
> >
> > : )
> >
> > "Ductman" <jmiles@g...> wrote:
> > > so what are you saying that you haven't got a
> chance with anyone,
> > > except the buttons on your calculator??
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > [OT] math : density of Laura Bertram
> dopplegangers in USA,
> > > > computations and conjectures...
> > > >
> > > > I have come across 5 Laura Bertram look alikes
> at UW Seattle
> > > > (www.washington.edu) in the USA.
> > > >
> > > > I did not spend any time with any of these
> young and fertile females
> > > > while they were in heat, so I can't suggest
> what kind of hot kitten
> > > > Laura might be like in the sack.
> > > >
> > > > Also:
> > > > American Imperialist females only come onto
> heat when they discover
> > > > you are rich, and otherwise don't care if you
> exist -- so I have been
> > > > spared from a negative stereotypical view of
> these phenotypes and of
> > > > Bertie as well.
> > > >
> > > > Nevertheless, it crossed my mind that this
> particular female
> > > > phenotype must be highly avalable in the US.
> Laura look alikes, I
> > > > thought, must be hypercommon, I thought. So I
> ran the numbers...
> > > >
> > > > Here are my computations:
> > > >
> > > > UW (Seattle) has 40,000 students. There are 5
> dopplegangers.
> > > > UW as a whole must have 7 dopplegagners. {3
> campuses}
> > > >
> > > > There are 125,000 university and college
> students in Puget Sound
> > > > (Greater Seattle). Therefore there are 21
> dopplegangers in Greater
> > > > Seattle.
> > > >
> > > > Greater Seattle has about 3 million people.
> > > > The US has about 250 million people.
> > > > 250/3 = 83
> > > >
> > > > 83 {USA pop mul constant} x 21 {Seattle
> Density} = 1,750 Laura Bertram
> > > > Dopplegangers.
> > > >
> > > > CORRECTION:
> > > > UW Seattle as an initial sample space is very
> bad, as there is a
> > > > higher WASP girl density than in the rest of
> the US -- espcially the
> > > > US slave states.
> > > >
> > > > I will extrapolate that I am off by 15%,
> overcompensating so:
> > > >
> > > > Corrected Dopplegangers = 1750 -1750(15%) =
> 1750 - 262 = 1488
> > > >
> > > > 1,488 / 250 {million} = 0.00000595 of the US
> population (not a
> > > > percent)
> > > >
> > > > 50 {States} / 1488 = an average of 30
> Dopplegagners per US state,
> > > > albeit fewer in the former slave states and
> fewer in the less
> > > > populated western sates.
>
>
>


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com