No. Theoretically speaking, if you were to look hard enough, one could
find some Laura Bertram doppleganger to insemiate on a weekly interval.

Laura is not my type, but her phenotype is very common.
I would prefer Angela Devi or other like birds.

: )

"Ductman" <jmiles@g...> wrote:
> so what are you saying that you haven't got a chance with anyone,
> except the buttons on your calculator??
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > [OT] math : density of Laura Bertram dopplegangers in USA,
> > computations and conjectures...
> >
> > I have come across 5 Laura Bertram look alikes at UW Seattle
> > (www.washington.edu) in the USA.
> >
> > I did not spend any time with any of these young and fertile females
> > while they were in heat, so I can't suggest what kind of hot kitten
> > Laura might be like in the sack.
> >
> > Also:
> > American Imperialist females only come onto heat when they discover
> > you are rich, and otherwise don't care if you exist -- so I have been
> > spared from a negative stereotypical view of these phenotypes and of
> > Bertie as well.
> >
> > Nevertheless, it crossed my mind that this particular female
> > phenotype must be highly avalable in the US. Laura look alikes, I
> > thought, must be hypercommon, I thought. So I ran the numbers...
> >
> > Here are my computations:
> >
> > UW (Seattle) has 40,000 students. There are 5 dopplegangers.
> > UW as a whole must have 7 dopplegagners. {3 campuses}
> >
> > There are 125,000 university and college students in Puget Sound
> > (Greater Seattle). Therefore there are 21 dopplegangers in Greater
> > Seattle.
> >
> > Greater Seattle has about 3 million people.
> > The US has about 250 million people.
> > 250/3 = 83
> >
> > 83 {USA pop mul constant} x 21 {Seattle Density} = 1,750 Laura Bertram
> > Dopplegangers.
> >
> > CORRECTION:
> > UW Seattle as an initial sample space is very bad, as there is a
> > higher WASP girl density than in the rest of the US -- espcially the
> > US slave states.
> >
> > I will extrapolate that I am off by 15%, overcompensating so:
> >
> > Corrected Dopplegangers = 1750 -1750(15%) = 1750 - 262 = 1488
> >
> > 1,488 / 250 {million} = 0.00000595 of the US population (not a
> > percent)
> >
> > 50 {States} / 1488 = an average of 30 Dopplegagners per US state,
> > albeit fewer in the former slave states and fewer in the less
> > populated western sates.