Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
a_film_by
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: Cineaste, auteur etc: A group FAQ?   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #7466 of 48868 |
Re: [a_film_by] Re: the Same Old Arguments

I think Dan is right on target about what auteurism contributed. An
addendum, though:

Dan Sallitt wrote:

> no one had any trouble dealing with Griffith, von
>Stroheim, and Eisenstein before auteurism.
>
I think maybe auteurism was needed to appreciate some *late* Griffiths.
Something like "Isn't Life Wonderful," which isn't particularly
consciously artful, is my favorite Griffith up until that time. And then
there's the generally reviled "The Struggle," which I think is great. A
key early moment for me was going to the MoMA's Griffith retrospective,
I believe in the summer of 1964, and reading about his "decline" in the
catalogue and elsewhere, and then seeing the counter-evidence on the
screen: "Orphans of the Storm," "The Sorrows of Satan," "Abraham
Lincoln" -- all of them, really.

- Fred




Fri Feb 13, 2004 3:33 am

fredcamper
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #7466 of 48868 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

To Bill, definitions would be great. Thanks in advance. To all, perhaps we should gradually construct a FAQ for our group? ("FAQ" = a very common 'Net term for...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
12:35 am

... notion ... I'm having a hell of a time duking it out with some youngsters on the Rotten Tomatoes discussion board ...
Jaime N. Christley
j_christley
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
1:12 am

Do the people you talk with watch many silent movies? It is hard to look at the visual glories of Griffith, Eisenstein, Sternberg, Stroheim, Keaton, etc, and...
MG4273@...
nzkpzq
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
1:51 am

... the ... Pretty interesting discussion, though I got exhausted well before the end. One thing that struck me was the mention of Paddy Chayevsky, who also...
jaketwilson
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
11:46 am

... Chayevsky is the auteur of all the films written by him with the exception of "Altered States." Cromwell and Lumet are both very fine directors (and...
David Ehrenstein
cellar47
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
2:49 pm

... Do you ever know any other way to put things? ... Obviously a strong writer will overpower a weak director. But that doesn't make the writer an auteur....
Jaime N. Christley
j_christley
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
3:06 pm

... You act as if there's something "unnatural" about this. It doesn't "diminish" the work in question at all. It's a simple fact of film history and...
David Ehrenstein
cellar47
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
4:37 pm

... What? I don't follow. ... How can I get used to something that registers as just plain incorrect, and barely makes sense? -Jaime...
Jaime N. Christley
j_christley
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
4:42 pm

... What's incorrext or nonsensical about it? Chayevsky didn't just write "Network" -- he produced it. He HIRED Sidney Lumet to direct his script and had ...
David Ehrenstein
cellar47
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
4:55 pm

... I mean, could you support your argument with another film? I mean, the circumstances you describe would seem to support auteurism because the strong and...
Jaime N. Christley
j_christley
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
5:18 pm

... Look at "The Best Man" -- written and produced by Gore Vidal and directed by Franklin Schaffner. Not bland at all. ... Right. Much like Russell's...
David Ehrenstein
cellar47
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
5:49 pm

... I'll check it out when I get a chance. ... I disagree and feel you're misusing the term, but you know I think that. ... Straw man. Never said that. -Jaime...
Jaime N. Christley
j_christley
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
5:59 pm

... See, I take issue with Meyers' assumption that there is an innate dominance at work within any particular movie. And she's far from the only one who talks...
Dan Sallitt
sallitt1
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
4:20 pm

... at their ... r how many ... eur of THE ... "I think ... an aesthetic ... Chayevsky is the major creative force behind The Hospital, but well that´s true...
filipefurtado
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
5:01 pm

... I ... Nope. "The In-Laws" -- and Andrew Bergman film directed by Arthur Hiller -- is superiror. I ... Or not. __________________________________ Do you...
David Ehrenstein
cellar47
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
5:44 pm

I think I agree with both David and Jaime here, if that's possible. I saw "Network" on its initial release. I enjoyed it mildly for the bitter and telling...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
5:18 pm

... to rate "Network" as a bad film ... and ... dogma, and I've found very few exceptions. ... Fred, arguing with himself: Aren't you contradicting yourself...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
5:47 pm

... I don't consider Chuck Walters to be an auteur, Fred. or who Bertolucci boffed during which ... Or Allen Midgette either. Maybe it will be healthy for our...
David Ehrenstein
cellar47
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
5:58 pm

... As we've discussed before, "auteur" can mean "great director who is the author of his films," but it can also mean "director who is clearly the author of...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
6:17 pm

... Obviously, having power over a film is very important. But this idea way pre-dates auteurism. America has always lavished attention on powerful directors...
Dan Sallitt
sallitt1
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
6:44 pm

... What's more or less original about auteurism ... And then they might NOT. I'm perfectlyaware of the fac that this is Absolute Sacrilege, but Howard hawks...
David Ehrenstein
cellar47
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
7:09 pm

... Excellent observation as usual, Dan. We should really slide away from the "X is *really* the auteur" statements (and even, "X and Y are both the real...
Zach Campbell
rashomon82
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
8:06 pm

... there's at least one other member of this group who is willing to join in the absolute sacrilege -- myself. There are three, maybe four Hawks films I love...
jpcoursodon
Offline Send Email
Feb 13, 2004
12:53 am

... -- Tosh Berman TamTam Books http://www.tamtambooks.com...
Tosh
tosh3@...
Send Email
Feb 13, 2004
4:41 am

... Sure, but...? No one would disagree with this. ... Sacrilege is fine - I certainly don't like every director in the auteurist canon. But I'm trying to...
Dan Sallitt
sallitt1
Offline Send Email
Feb 13, 2004
3:19 am

I think Dan is right on target about what auteurism contributed. An addendum, though: ... I think maybe auteurism was needed to appreciate some *late*...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Feb 13, 2004
3:31 am

... I always found Dan's formulation to be extremely useful, that the auteur theory isn't really a theory so much as an aesthetic. As such it allows that...
Joseph Kaufman
joka13us
Offline Send Email
Feb 12, 2004
9:58 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help