Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
a_film_by
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
WARNING: MGM has botched the Ingmar Bergman Collection!   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #7165 of 48868 |
Re: [a_film_by] WARNING: MGM has botched the Ingmar Bergman Collection!

A better and bigger idea: People with a little time on their hands
should choose directors of the 50s, 60s, and 70s that they love, and
contact the director and cinematographer of key films to find out what
the intended aspect ratios were. JPC, are Bresson's cinematographers
still around? Was he framing for the European 1.66:1; was he framing for
1.33:1; was he trying to make films that would work at anything between
1.33 to 1.85, or what?

These are the questions I wish had been asked of Sirk, Welles, and
Russell Metty. The 35mm prints of "All That Heaven Allows" and "Written
on the Wind" are 1.33:1, as are prints of many Hollywood films of the
1950s; how were they really intended to be shown by their makers,
regardless of what theaters were doing? And are some cinematographers
from that period still living? Our group could take on a collective
project that might be really really useful.

- Fred




Sun Feb 1, 2004 7:11 pm

fredcamper
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #7165 of 48868 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

MGM has seriously cropped EVERY disc released in this collection! It is a travesty....my most-awaited collection turns into a complete hack job (literally)! ...
Raymond P.
grimmyhk
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2004
8:16 am

Hmm. From the Web site it looks as if the images have been cropped from 1.33:1 to 1.62:1. But isn't that what theaters all over the world have been doing since...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2004
2:36 pm

... from ... have ... Bergman ... that way. ... This raises a puzzling question: why would Bergman and his DP elect to shoot in 1.33:1 while knowing full well...
jpcoursodon
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2004
4:35 pm

... It might be an even better idea for someone, maybe among the Swedish-speakers here, to contact Svensk Filmindustri directly to find an authority on the...
Craig Keller
evillights
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2004
5:15 pm

In my experience art houses in the 1960s were pretty alert to what the ratio was supposed to be. That information could frequently be found officially...
Joseph Kaufman
joka13us
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2004
7:23 pm

I saw both "Shame" and "Hour of the Wolf" at a retrospective last year, and the films were DEFINITELY not 1.66:1. They were 1.37:1, just like Peerpee (Nick)...
Raymond P.
grimmyhk
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2004
2:14 am

A better and bigger idea: People with a little time on their hands should choose directors of the 50s, 60s, and 70s that they love, and contact the director...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2004
7:11 pm

... For what it's worth, Criterion's website has Seventh Seal (1957) 1:33 Through a Glass Darkly (1961) 1:33 Winter Light (1962) 1:33 The Silence (1963) 1:33 ...
Jess Amortell
jess_l_amortell
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2004
10:48 pm

... Wild Strawberries: should be 1957 of course. Which leaves '63 to '72 up for grabs......
Jess Amortell
jess_l_amortell
Offline Send Email
Feb 1, 2004
10:56 pm

"The Serpent's Egg" was a theatrical release. I've never seen it either. ... __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web...
David Ehrenstein
cellar47
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2004
12:46 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help