Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
a_film_by
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
INLAND EMPIRE: THE BREVITY EDIT screens tonight (16th) in L.A.   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #47503 of 48868 |
Greetings --

I'm a frequent reader/infrequent poster to a_film_by, but just wanted to extend
an
invitation to all those in Los Angeles to come check out a free screening of my
82-minute
fan edit of "Inland Empire" tonight (Wednesday the 16th) at 10.30PM, at the
Silent Movie
Theatre, located at 611 N Fairfax Avenue, 90036.

Below are my "filmmaker's notes" for the project, if you're curious:




As a lifelong fan of the films of David Lynch, I walked into a showing of
"Inland Empire"
upon its original theatrical run with both joy and trepidation. On one hand,
since the film
was self-financed and -distributed, it was possible that Lynch's unconstrained
fertile
imagination would paint the screen in an uninhibited, unfiltered way the likes
of which we
the audience hadn't seen since "Eraserhead". On the other hand, it was also
possible that
the film's three-hour running time meant that Lynch had no one telling him --
least of all
the film's editor, which, according to the IMDB, was Lynch himself -- that maybe
some
stuff just doesn't play well (the film's end credits curiously do not list an
editor.)

As the curtains closed in the theater after this first viewing, I felt I was
mostly right on
both counts. What I saw was 90 minutes of good, and 90 minutes of not-good.
Every
other Lynch fan I've talked to about this film has felt the same, although no
two fans see
eye-to-eye on which 90 minutes they would cut, if given the chance to re-edit
the thing
themselves.

The "good" that I saw was a combination of all the things I've come to expect
from Lynch's
work: dread, unpredictability, silly-natured humor, superb sound design and a
sense of
pace that is unmistakably Lynchian. Some of the "not-good" stems from what I'll
call the
"lack of collaboration", meaning that when watching "Inland Empire", with all
its
homegrown charm and inherent faults, you become acutely aware just how much of
Lynch's final products rely on his actors, cinematographers, production
designers -- and
editors. Also, throughout the film, there are performances that simply don't
add up, either
because some of the actors are untrained and unequipped -- or because at times
the
"known" trained actors were required to spit out reams of poorly rendered
dialogue,
making it sound like it was made up on-the-spot, which it very well could have
been.

Too often, the film suffers from Lynch not being able to say "no" to himself.
With "Inland
Empire", the Lynchian mystique has deflated.

The version of the film you're about to see is my attempt at enhancing
everything which I
feel Lynch got right, while jettisoning lines, shots, scenes or even entire
plots and
characters which take the viewer out of the "Inland Empire" universe Lynch tried
so
carefully to construct. With my "enhancing" comes a considerable shortening of
running
time, as I feel the "less is more" attitude helps, rather than hurts this
particular film. In
Lynch's other films, everything feels in its place, even if the material takes
wild tangents.
In "Inland Empire", however, much feels too disconnected, with little in a place
that feels
right.

The 2007 DVD release of "Inland Empire" contained the 180-minute film, plus 75
minutes
of deleted scenes. This version, which I've titled "The Brevity Edit", includes
material from
both and runs a total of 82 minutes. I've tried to make this edit as seamless
as possible,
but there will be times where the seams might show, since of course I had no
access to
either the film's raw footage or unedited music score. I've also removed all
film credits
from this version, as Lynch has set a precedent of removing his name from a film
versions
which are not his, as evidenced by the syndicated-TV expanded cut of "Dune".

I sincerely hope that if Mr. Lynch hears of or sees the Brevity Edit, he is not
mortally
offended, but rather treats it as a critical response to his work.

Enjoy.






Again, check out a free screening of my 82-minute fan edit of "Inland Empire"
tonight
(Wednesday the 16th) at 10.30PM, at the Silent Movie Theatre, located at 611 N
Fairfax
Avenue, 90036.




Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:34 pm

eggcity101
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #47503 of 48868 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Greetings -- I'm a frequent reader/infrequent poster to a_film_by, but just wanted to extend an invitation to all those in Los Angeles to come check out a free...
eggcity101
Offline Send Email
Jan 16, 2008
6:34 pm

Sounds great as I felt the same way about this film, parts of it went on and on without any real focus.. any chance it'll be available as a torrent, as I in...
richardwaddel74
Offline Send Email
Jan 16, 2008
10:56 pm

On Jan 16, 2008 5:56 PM, richardwaddel74 <richardwaddel74@...> ... I'd also be curious to see this if it ever got up online somewhere, although in...
Edward Howard
seven_arts112
Offline Send Email
Jan 16, 2008
11:07 pm

I have a feeling that Lynch, if he hears about it, would be delighted to hear about this. I myself not having seen the film do believe it is a very interesting...
Eduardo Valente - gru...
egroupsrules
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2008
1:19 pm

... wanted to extend an ... screening of my 82-minute ... 10.30PM, at the Silent Movie ... With all due respect, I think your time would have been a lot better...
thebradstevens
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2008
1:43 pm

... Of course, there is one major difference between this and the old studio examples you give: the original still exists. And why would someone's time be...
Marc Raymond
mraymond_1918
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2008
3:56 pm

... "Of course, there is one major difference between this and the old studio examples you give: the original still exists. And why would someone's time be...
Richard Modiano
tharpa2002
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2008
4:40 pm

... And a very complex original it is. One might profitably spend as much time analyzing it as Joyce specialists have spent analyzing ULYSSES. Whereas a...
thebradstevens
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2008
6:12 pm

... So unless I'm misunderstanding things, it now seems as if there are at least two members of a_film_by who are on record as saying that it is possible for...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2008
6:24 pm

... of ... at ... is ... they ... It seems not unreasonable for me to say that I have no interest in seeing a David Lynch film in a version other than the one...
thebradstevens
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2008
6:54 pm

Fred, If one of the people you are referring to is me, I never said I had an opinion on the Haynes film. My objections were directed toward what critics pro...
peterhenne
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2008
7:41 pm

Peter and Brad, Thanks for your answers. Perhaps I was misreading you; perhaps you should write a bit differently. I might say something like, "Based on the...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2008
8:04 pm

... seen, ... a ... to 'Inland ... be a ... Given what I know of your tastes, I'd actually be extremely interested to hear your response to INLAND EMPIRE, as I...
thebradstevens
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2008
9:28 pm

... each of ... for ... ways ... But the unanswered question, it seems to me, is would you have reacted more benevolently than The Brad if someone here had...
jess_l_amortell
Offline Send Email
Jan 17, 2008
11:43 pm

... OK, so someone posts, "I liked some scenes in "El Dorado," but I found it mostly an incomprehensible turkey. Hawks didn't really know what he was doing...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2008
12:41 am

... Well said. As a great admirer of "Inland Empire," I for one will at least be curious to see, whenever this is put online, what the "brevity cut" might be ...
Edward Howard
seven_arts112
Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2008
1:01 am

I saw Bret's "Brevity Edit" and found it a rewarding experiment. I also happen to like Lynch's original. A fan re-edit is not only inevitable nowadays, but can...
Matt Armstrong
matt_c_armst...
Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2008
2:18 am

... but, my point remains, you can't really judge a work at all without ... to ... My point was that there is a difference between a work and a reduction of...
thebradstevens
Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2008
10:58 am

... Of course you're choosing a far less likely example than a reedit, but still, it all depends. There is a Ken Jacobs film, "Cops," that consists of the...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2008
3:51 pm

... "...If I were to invite you to a 'screening' of a panned-and-scanned video transfer of LOLA MONTES,claiming that the pan-and-scan process 'improved'...
Richard Modiano
tharpa2002
Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2008
4:36 pm

There is a Ken Jacobs film, "Cops," that consists of the famous ... blacked ... Yes, but the fact that this was presented as "A film by Ken Jacobs" - rather...
thebradstevens
Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2008
6:05 pm

I don't think that fairly characterizes what Brett meant. He said he made the edit to come to a better understanding of a film that he already admired, while...
peterhenne
Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2008
10:19 pm

... he ... to ... One of my favourite films is Bob Dylan's RENALDO AND CLARA (which actually has a lot in common with INLAND EMPIRE). Even after some 20 ...
thebradstevens
Offline Send Email
Jan 19, 2008
12:04 am

... Well, yeah. I haven't seen any of the films in question, and I still say that no matter what someone says about what he's doing, you cannot know what the...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Jan 19, 2008
4:45 am

... still say ... know ... dumbing ... Where we disagree is in our definition of what constitutes a 'work'. A film which has been edited for television is not...
thebradstevens
Offline Send Email
Jan 19, 2008
12:22 pm

... "...These things are reductions of works, and it seems to me that all we need know about them can be summed up quite adequately by the descriptions of...
Richard Modiano
tharpa2002
Offline Send Email
Jan 19, 2008
4:00 pm

There's was also a projection of THE SEARCHERS that lasted for I believe a year. The details are hazy, but it's recounted in the recent collection of essays on...
Marc Raymond
mraymond_1918
Offline Send Email
Jan 19, 2008
4:57 pm

... Yes, of course. And the pan and scan things I have seen have been uniformly horrible. The distinction I want to make, the "Talmudic" distinction following ...
Fred Camper
fredcamper
Offline Send Email
Jan 19, 2008
5:53 pm

... following ... and ... to ... not a ... first ... second. Is John Cage's "4' 33"" a "work" just because he ... a "work" ... This is where the artist's...
thebradstevens
Offline Send Email
Jan 19, 2008
6:18 pm
First  | < Prev  |  Next > Last 
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help